So, I decided to give internet dating a little go to try and end my tragic love life. Instead what occured was I collated a number of 'enquiries' from men for your entertainment. I guess it gives great insight into the mind of some people out there looking for luuuurve.
Here are some messages I have received from men (and women) who have contacted me.
"Hello, I'm very genuine and nice :0)"
"Wheres York from here lm leaning toplay uke myself and have allways dated the younger lady as l like a fit bird on my arm."
"Hello beautiful lady x I’m pretty new to all this so you’ll have to go with me here…..I’ve only just moved to the area….I say just but I’ve been in Yorkshire either West or East for around 6 months now….looking to put my roots down and fall head over heels in love with a beautiful and caring person, maybe that person could be you…not really sure about the whole internet dating site thing but I’d like to think it really did work and put right all my friends who said its wrong if that makes sense x I’ve read you profile a few times now and I like what I’ve read, so I thought I should take the time out and send you a message, hopefully leading to something else maybe ? Maybe get to know each other a little better? Who knows unless we take a chance on each other right……
Well I’ll see if I get a reply back x hopefully I will, until then take care, hugs and kisses Jez xxx"
I didnt respond to him so he sent...
"hello beautiful lady x have sent you messages before but your probably inundated with them or i'm simply not your type....if it's the first case....could i persuade you to forget them and take a chance on me xxx promise you won't regret it or look back jez x"
"Can you cope with the distance and time? X (I just wondered if he was asking me a maths equation?)
"hello, think we'd click en have some fun getting to know each other, I'm single, 34, no kids en never married, want to chat or arrange a meet up or something sexy u??xx"
"Well what can I say, perhaps you have me intrigued ;-)"
"hi hunni, you're stunnin :)i know it says youre straight, but i'll be honest, do u know what a shemale is? a girl with 'extras'? lol, well, if ur into it would love to chat, do you have msn? x"
"Wow you are stunning! And a fellow yorkie! Love York, anyway hope you are well on this drizzly day x"
"hey do u fancy a chat with a real life gentle giant x" (from a 7ft man!)
"hya sexy hav u gt eny fetishes xxxxxxx"
"Hi
Could you please consider me for the boyfriend role your currently advertising.
I believe I posess many of the skills required and the enthusiasm to learn those I my not, I have previous expierience of relationships and its a minefield I feel comfortable in and find the challenge of a female very enjoyable and rewarding.
Thank you for reading my application and I look forward to hearing from you soon
Regards
Nathan"
"hiya;)"
"Just writing to register my interest in you.
Your profile is really well written! You seem a girl full of interests :D
Hope you write back."
"Hi there how's u doing? Been a while since I've been here I'm maybe very shy at first but liked ur profile so thought I'd be brave try break the ice hope u don't mind?
Well hope to hear back from u till then takecare hugs"
"Coooooool you play the Uke! o/\o ^5 >_>^ ^_ Awesome. I'll take you out! :-)"
"hi,so whats been your strangest date?"
to be continued!..........
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
Pick me! Pick me! Replies to my internet dating pofile!
So, I decided to give internet dating a little go to try and end my tragic love life. Instead what occured was I collated a number of 'enquiries' from men for your entertainment. I guess it gives great insight into the mind of some people out there looking for luuuurve.
Here are some messages I have received from men (and women) who have contacted me.
"
I didnt respond to him so he sent...
"
"hello, think we'd click en have some
"
Here are some messages I have received from men (and women) who have contacted me.
"
I didnt respond to him so he sent...
"
"hello, think we'd click en have some
"
Tuesday, 6 September 2011
Today's pet, Tomorrow's stray/abandoned dog!
I feel a great need to discus the rise in abandoned and stray dogs. You may have seen in the press recently that this problem is at its highest in 11 years and charity animal rescues are unable to cope with the increased number of dogs being abandoned, often resulting in healthy dogs being put down.
There is currently a huge problem with the commonly known 'status dog'; the staffordshire bull terrier, a dog once known as a loyal, family dog, now becoming victim to a thug's ideology of having a fighting dog by their side.
The number of staffies being bred and sold for hundreds of pounds as a puppy, not receiving basic training or social skills, or worse being 'hardened' as a fighting dog, and being abandoned by its owner as an adult is shockingly high. Of course, this does not only apply to the staffy, pure breed and mongrel puppies are bred for a quick cash injection, being sold to people who love a tiny, cute and fluffy puppy and disown them once they have grown, needing bigger meals, proper training, time and love. Something that my dogs Rusty and molly were victims of.
Luckily my dogs never made it to the rescue centre, Rusty was advertised as 'dog free to good home' and Molly was left in my care following a 4 day 'holiday'. I do wonder what would have happened had they been abandoned, or allowed to roam the street until a dog warden picked them up. There is a likelihood that there may not have been space for them in a rescue centre, if Rusty had shown his boisterous side he may have been classed as a socially inadequate dog, not fit for re-homing and put down. All because a family wanted a puppy for Christmas, and 7 months down the line became surplus to requirement.
For me, the answer is simple. If you are looking for a family pet, companion, friend don't buy from a breeder, adopt a rescue dog. Essentially it is a more responsible way to acquire your excellent addition to your family.There are often puppies available if an older dog is not what you are looking for. House checks and the qualified 'matching' process is a very good and responsible way to ensure that you and your dog are well suited in terms of lifestyle, and general compatibility.
But I must go back to an important point. There are many reasons a dog is abandoned. The rescue centres are finding that some dogs are found roaming the streets with no microchip or identity tag on its collar. Some dogs who are identified and returned to it's owner are returned back to it's home only to find the owner no longer wants it back. Some owners see a dog as a luxury, and with the economic climate making finances more difficult, it is the first thing to go to save some money. Or, quite simply, some people can no longer afford a dog (but probably still afford to spend £30 a week on booze and fags!)
Taken from The Dogs Trust Website: http://www.dogstrust.org.uk/mediacentre/newsreleases/pr09straydogssurvey.aspx
On average 12 stray and abandoned dogs an hour are now handled by Local Authorities. Each hour:
Ensure your dog is microchipped. The Dogs Trust and some local vets offer a free microchipping service, call your vet for advice and information.
Make sure your dog receives its annual inoculations. Again, there are a number of services available where you may get this free or at a reduced cost. Look out for offers run by the Vaccination Amnesty or ring your vet or the PDSA for advice. There are often deals for worming and flea treatments too. Do your research before you pay. There are a number of discounted retailers such as Wilkinsons and Boyes where you will find this at a lower cost too.
Insure your pet! Yes insurance can save you the horror of that niggling thought in the back of your brain, which is forever questioning how you would ever afford vets treatment in the event of an emergency.
http://www.gocompare.com/pet-insurance/
And aside from walking your pet and remembering to pick up it's poo - the little critter needs feeding.
Many people will opt for the standard mixer with tinned meat option and feed them this day-in-day-out. My advice is DON'T! How would you feel eating the same meal each day? Dogs are omnivores and will eat everything. However they are not allowed chocolate or onions!
I've figured out a way to feed my dogs a very exciting and varied diet that is more nutritionally sound for them then feeding them a tin of Butchers. Many dog foods on the market do not contain good cuts of meat. it is a 'derivative of' meat'. Gross! A dogs meal should be split into 3 components, carbs, veg meat. in this dairy is necessary too, but not every day.
For the carb section they have a mix of cooked rice, pasta and lentils, sometimes porridge too.
For the veg section they have peas, broad beans, courgette, apple, banana, plums, brambles, carrots, tomato's basically anything - just not onions. Peas are excellent for dogs as they also contain calcium as well as vitamins.
Its so satisfying searching the 'reduced' meat counters and getting better quality foods for cheaper than commercial dog foods.
Dogs need dairy, but not everyday. Give them a bowl of porridge with a splash of milk, a little sprinkling of cheese or a raw/cooked egg.
Remember, dogs need to keep their teeth in tip top condition. Eating soft foods can cause their teeth to begin to rot so as a treat chuck them a carrot, or alternate the 'carbs' section with some mixer biscuits. Try to avoid sugary foods for them too.
I currently spend around £40 a month insuring and feeding both of my dogs. That's the cost of a night out, or for some of you around 6 packets of cigarettes or filling up your car with petrol for a few days.
Dogs are my favorite thing in the whole world. They do not chose to come into your home. you chose them so don't make them a victim. Choose wisely, responsibly and be prepared for good and bad days, but most importantly, enjoy their joy when you come home and they bounce around you so very pleased by your return!
There is currently a huge problem with the commonly known 'status dog'; the staffordshire bull terrier, a dog once known as a loyal, family dog, now becoming victim to a thug's ideology of having a fighting dog by their side.
The number of staffies being bred and sold for hundreds of pounds as a puppy, not receiving basic training or social skills, or worse being 'hardened' as a fighting dog, and being abandoned by its owner as an adult is shockingly high. Of course, this does not only apply to the staffy, pure breed and mongrel puppies are bred for a quick cash injection, being sold to people who love a tiny, cute and fluffy puppy and disown them once they have grown, needing bigger meals, proper training, time and love. Something that my dogs Rusty and molly were victims of.
Luckily my dogs never made it to the rescue centre, Rusty was advertised as 'dog free to good home' and Molly was left in my care following a 4 day 'holiday'. I do wonder what would have happened had they been abandoned, or allowed to roam the street until a dog warden picked them up. There is a likelihood that there may not have been space for them in a rescue centre, if Rusty had shown his boisterous side he may have been classed as a socially inadequate dog, not fit for re-homing and put down. All because a family wanted a puppy for Christmas, and 7 months down the line became surplus to requirement.
For me, the answer is simple. If you are looking for a family pet, companion, friend don't buy from a breeder, adopt a rescue dog. Essentially it is a more responsible way to acquire your excellent addition to your family.There are often puppies available if an older dog is not what you are looking for. House checks and the qualified 'matching' process is a very good and responsible way to ensure that you and your dog are well suited in terms of lifestyle, and general compatibility.
But I must go back to an important point. There are many reasons a dog is abandoned. The rescue centres are finding that some dogs are found roaming the streets with no microchip or identity tag on its collar. Some dogs who are identified and returned to it's owner are returned back to it's home only to find the owner no longer wants it back. Some owners see a dog as a luxury, and with the economic climate making finances more difficult, it is the first thing to go to save some money. Or, quite simply, some people can no longer afford a dog (but probably still afford to spend £30 a week on booze and fags!)
Taken from The Dogs Trust Website: http://www.dogstrust.org.uk/mediacentre/newsreleases/pr09straydogssurvey.aspx
On average 12 stray and abandoned dogs an hour are now handled by Local Authorities. Each hour:
- 5 are reunited with their owners
- 3 are taken to welfare organisations
- 1 is rehomed from the Local Authority kennels
- 2 are in kennels for their seven day holding period
- 1 dog is put to sleep
Ensure your dog is microchipped. The Dogs Trust and some local vets offer a free microchipping service, call your vet for advice and information.
Make sure your dog receives its annual inoculations. Again, there are a number of services available where you may get this free or at a reduced cost. Look out for offers run by the Vaccination Amnesty or ring your vet or the PDSA for advice. There are often deals for worming and flea treatments too. Do your research before you pay. There are a number of discounted retailers such as Wilkinsons and Boyes where you will find this at a lower cost too.
Insure your pet! Yes insurance can save you the horror of that niggling thought in the back of your brain, which is forever questioning how you would ever afford vets treatment in the event of an emergency.
http://www.gocompare.com/pet-insurance/
And aside from walking your pet and remembering to pick up it's poo - the little critter needs feeding.
Many people will opt for the standard mixer with tinned meat option and feed them this day-in-day-out. My advice is DON'T! How would you feel eating the same meal each day? Dogs are omnivores and will eat everything. However they are not allowed chocolate or onions!
I've figured out a way to feed my dogs a very exciting and varied diet that is more nutritionally sound for them then feeding them a tin of Butchers. Many dog foods on the market do not contain good cuts of meat. it is a 'derivative of' meat'. Gross! A dogs meal should be split into 3 components, carbs, veg meat. in this dairy is necessary too, but not every day.
For the carb section they have a mix of cooked rice, pasta and lentils, sometimes porridge too.
For the veg section they have peas, broad beans, courgette, apple, banana, plums, brambles, carrots, tomato's basically anything - just not onions. Peas are excellent for dogs as they also contain calcium as well as vitamins.
Its so satisfying searching the 'reduced' meat counters and getting better quality foods for cheaper than commercial dog foods.
Dogs need dairy, but not everyday. Give them a bowl of porridge with a splash of milk, a little sprinkling of cheese or a raw/cooked egg.
Remember, dogs need to keep their teeth in tip top condition. Eating soft foods can cause their teeth to begin to rot so as a treat chuck them a carrot, or alternate the 'carbs' section with some mixer biscuits. Try to avoid sugary foods for them too.
I currently spend around £40 a month insuring and feeding both of my dogs. That's the cost of a night out, or for some of you around 6 packets of cigarettes or filling up your car with petrol for a few days.
Dogs are my favorite thing in the whole world. They do not chose to come into your home. you chose them so don't make them a victim. Choose wisely, responsibly and be prepared for good and bad days, but most importantly, enjoy their joy when you come home and they bounce around you so very pleased by your return!
Saturday, 3 September 2011
One Day by David Nicholls: Book to Film
I don't want to turn this into a book review because I am assuming that if you have chosen to read this blog, you have read the book, or recently seen the film. When I mentioned to fellow friends and colleagues that I was going to see the film of One Day I was met with comments of 'oh it has terrible reviews' and 'Anne Hathaway's Yorkshire accent is meant to be terrible'. This I had to see for myself!
As someone who formed a bond with Emma and fancied Dexter in the book, my first criticism of the film when it began was... ANNE HATHAWAY as Emma??!!?? A warm, naive, directionless West Yorkshire lass being played by a well known, glamorous, American actress. Quite simply, casting fail! The casting would have been better if Film4 hadn't got to big for its boots and stuck with a less well known, British actress, who may have some sympathetic inkling as to the character and culture of Emma.
Using a less well known actress would have worked wonders for the film. It would have been more in-keeping with many Film 4 productions, as well as the book and the nature and narrative would have benefit from a lower budget production for a more gritty sense of realism.
Regretfully, however, Hathaway was unable to fill the role of Emma mostly due to her extremely confusing accent.
The West Yorkshire accent is easily identifiable. However, Hathaway built a rip roaringly laughable accent amid a highly rushed year by year account of her and Dexter's life on 15 July from the year 1988.
Her accent went from period drama/queens English to a mild Yorkshire accent to cockney to the most accentuated West Yorkshire accent, most likely found coming from the mouth of a farmer up in't dales tha knows lad!
Similarly, the accent of Jim Sturgess who plays Dexter was just plain odd. So odd, that I wondered throughout the film weather he too, is American playing English, but oh no! He's English. So I wonder why he sounded Australian and sometimes American?
The first 12 years of the film from 1988 to 2000 felt rushed, panic stricken almost it its pursuit to get the the part when Emma and Dexter fall out, become friends, and fall in love. That's what we all want right?
Wrong! - because in rushing to get to 'the good bit' it skimmed the surface of the complexities of their relationship, which didn't really come to light until Dexter began to fall as Emma began to rise.
The care free, arrogant, confident and transparent early days of Dexter were weak compared to the book, and it gave very little impression of Emma's loyalty and desire for him. Jim Sturgess created a creepy, irritating slime ball of a character out of Dexter, when in my opinion he was a little more sleek, manly, sexy and certainly less creepy in the book. He was a Jack the lad in the book, but in the film he came across as a spoilt teenager.
In the scene where Emma and Dexter go on holiday and end up skinny dipping, Dexter has some peculiar head tilting/shaking thing going on to imitate flirting. It was really very irritating and not sexy or flirtatious one bit.
The only redeeming moment where Sturgess began to play Dexter well was when he'd become more settled, albeit with a cheating wife and a baby girl. His failed career and his greying hair made a more endearing chap and this certainly was one of the turning points in the film where it made it more comparable with the book. He was more humorous. But I guess that is the point, someone who lives a life of drugs and debauchery are actually pretty boring to their onlookers.
In the book the moment that Emma is killed happens so quickly and so surprisingly that, for me and many others, that one page was read and re-read to make sure you had actually understood what had happened. Emma has just been killed, with about one third of the book left!
Because of the impact of Emma's death I was keen to see how this would be done on the big screen and I must confess, I wasn't disappointed!
Emma and Dexter discuss having children together and on the morning of Emma's death she founds out that yet again, she isn't pregnant, after a year of trying to conceive. She is upset and her and Dexter leave each other in the morning on a bad note.
Upon Emma's return home, she is riding her bike through some built up traffic. The mood is tense, you can sense danger, but then she turns onto a side street where it is quiet and safe, until she pulls out of the side street and WHAM - hit by HGV and dragged under it's body where she is left to die. The tense build up, followed by quiet calm certainly makes the impact alarmingly shocking and at no point do you want Emma to die. How can you? Where is the happy ending?
The happy ending comes from seeing the pain and upset Dexter suffers on the 1st anniversary of Emma's death. It comes from him being so utterly hurt that he is forced to return back home to his father to be cared for having lost their relationship because of Dexter's destructive behaviour at a time when his mother was dying of cancer. However, the happy ending is not the pain and suffering. It is the love that is felt by Dexter and by the viewer.
The happy ending also comes from Ian, Emma's hilarious and very well played ex-boyfriend, Ian, played by Rafe Spall who, knowing and understanding Emma and Dexter's bond, as friends and inevitably as lovers, seeks out Dexter on the 2nd anniversary of Emma's death. They both share a moment of remembrance the emotion and love for her are exuberant.
And finally, the happy ending comes from Dexter taking his little girl, Jasmine to Arthur's Seat in Edinburgh in memory of Emma, where before they make the summit we are returned to the last moment of Emma and Dexter's first meeting, where the promise of love begins.
So as I'm sure you can sense. I found this film a little bit cringe, but it certainly improved in the latter part of the film, where as the book for me, was a page turner from start to finish. My recommendation to you is...see the film for yourself. Make up your own mind. laugh at the terrible accents, cry at the emotional end and if you see the film before reading the book. Do yourself a favour...READ THE BOOK! :-)
As someone who formed a bond with Emma and fancied Dexter in the book, my first criticism of the film when it began was... ANNE HATHAWAY as Emma??!!?? A warm, naive, directionless West Yorkshire lass being played by a well known, glamorous, American actress. Quite simply, casting fail! The casting would have been better if Film4 hadn't got to big for its boots and stuck with a less well known, British actress, who may have some sympathetic inkling as to the character and culture of Emma.
Using a less well known actress would have worked wonders for the film. It would have been more in-keeping with many Film 4 productions, as well as the book and the nature and narrative would have benefit from a lower budget production for a more gritty sense of realism.
Regretfully, however, Hathaway was unable to fill the role of Emma mostly due to her extremely confusing accent.
The West Yorkshire accent is easily identifiable. However, Hathaway built a rip roaringly laughable accent amid a highly rushed year by year account of her and Dexter's life on 15 July from the year 1988.
Her accent went from period drama/queens English to a mild Yorkshire accent to cockney to the most accentuated West Yorkshire accent, most likely found coming from the mouth of a farmer up in't dales tha knows lad!
Similarly, the accent of Jim Sturgess who plays Dexter was just plain odd. So odd, that I wondered throughout the film weather he too, is American playing English, but oh no! He's English. So I wonder why he sounded Australian and sometimes American?
The first 12 years of the film from 1988 to 2000 felt rushed, panic stricken almost it its pursuit to get the the part when Emma and Dexter fall out, become friends, and fall in love. That's what we all want right?
Wrong! - because in rushing to get to 'the good bit' it skimmed the surface of the complexities of their relationship, which didn't really come to light until Dexter began to fall as Emma began to rise.
The care free, arrogant, confident and transparent early days of Dexter were weak compared to the book, and it gave very little impression of Emma's loyalty and desire for him. Jim Sturgess created a creepy, irritating slime ball of a character out of Dexter, when in my opinion he was a little more sleek, manly, sexy and certainly less creepy in the book. He was a Jack the lad in the book, but in the film he came across as a spoilt teenager.
In the scene where Emma and Dexter go on holiday and end up skinny dipping, Dexter has some peculiar head tilting/shaking thing going on to imitate flirting. It was really very irritating and not sexy or flirtatious one bit.
The only redeeming moment where Sturgess began to play Dexter well was when he'd become more settled, albeit with a cheating wife and a baby girl. His failed career and his greying hair made a more endearing chap and this certainly was one of the turning points in the film where it made it more comparable with the book. He was more humorous. But I guess that is the point, someone who lives a life of drugs and debauchery are actually pretty boring to their onlookers.
In the book the moment that Emma is killed happens so quickly and so surprisingly that, for me and many others, that one page was read and re-read to make sure you had actually understood what had happened. Emma has just been killed, with about one third of the book left!
Because of the impact of Emma's death I was keen to see how this would be done on the big screen and I must confess, I wasn't disappointed!
Emma and Dexter discuss having children together and on the morning of Emma's death she founds out that yet again, she isn't pregnant, after a year of trying to conceive. She is upset and her and Dexter leave each other in the morning on a bad note.
Upon Emma's return home, she is riding her bike through some built up traffic. The mood is tense, you can sense danger, but then she turns onto a side street where it is quiet and safe, until she pulls out of the side street and WHAM - hit by HGV and dragged under it's body where she is left to die. The tense build up, followed by quiet calm certainly makes the impact alarmingly shocking and at no point do you want Emma to die. How can you? Where is the happy ending?
The happy ending comes from seeing the pain and upset Dexter suffers on the 1st anniversary of Emma's death. It comes from him being so utterly hurt that he is forced to return back home to his father to be cared for having lost their relationship because of Dexter's destructive behaviour at a time when his mother was dying of cancer. However, the happy ending is not the pain and suffering. It is the love that is felt by Dexter and by the viewer.
The happy ending also comes from Ian, Emma's hilarious and very well played ex-boyfriend, Ian, played by Rafe Spall who, knowing and understanding Emma and Dexter's bond, as friends and inevitably as lovers, seeks out Dexter on the 2nd anniversary of Emma's death. They both share a moment of remembrance the emotion and love for her are exuberant.
And finally, the happy ending comes from Dexter taking his little girl, Jasmine to Arthur's Seat in Edinburgh in memory of Emma, where before they make the summit we are returned to the last moment of Emma and Dexter's first meeting, where the promise of love begins.
So as I'm sure you can sense. I found this film a little bit cringe, but it certainly improved in the latter part of the film, where as the book for me, was a page turner from start to finish. My recommendation to you is...see the film for yourself. Make up your own mind. laugh at the terrible accents, cry at the emotional end and if you see the film before reading the book. Do yourself a favour...READ THE BOOK! :-)
Tuesday, 30 August 2011
Why Oh Why? Camel Toe!
So camel toe is sexy, right? Its a question I ponder, Monday to Friday at around 5:20pm.
You see, there is a woman whom I pass most days on the walk home from work and I'm becoming all too familiar with the outline and shape of her vagina, particularly the dimensions of her bacon drapes! I think for the purpose of this blog we'll call this lady Kitty.
I know the connotations that come with the words 'camel toe'. Its generally frowned upon as a fashion faux pas and can be both amusing and embarassing for the spectator of such a debacle but I've come to the conclusion that Kitty has thrown social conditioning to the wind and wears her camel toe with pride.
I know it may seem a little odd that I'm talking about a strangers vagina, but I don't think this is a mistake, its a form of communication. She's presenting her hoo hoo for you and I to see. Free from inhibitions and embarasment, she is showing off her vagina's cleavage, or cleavag as I've so fondly named it!
Kitty's cleavag!
But, is Kitty's cleavag happy? I cant imagine that wearing an item of clothing so tight that it visibly tries to split you in two is very comfortable? Does it chafe? Does it bleed? Does it even exist, what if its been rubbed away? What if its a fake! Kitty's cleavag is a fraud!
Ok, sorry about that, but anyway my point is...why? The sick part of me thinks she gets kicks from the gusset of her tight jeans rubbing against her with each step she takes. Then the samaritan in me thinks maybe she has no money and can't afford new clothes that fit. The psychologist in me thinks she might be mentally ill? Maybe she's an exhibitionist and likes to go for a walk and count how many people look at her vagina lips through the fabric of her jeans? Maybe its her hobby?
Either way, I've decided I wont ever stop and ask her, nor will I be promoting camel toe as a fashion trend. I'll stick with my VPL but I do salute you, whoever you are, Kitty, camel toe-cleavag woman for making me question the stigma that is camel toe and the person behind it!
Yours Inquisitively
Crazy Fairy
You see, there is a woman whom I pass most days on the walk home from work and I'm becoming all too familiar with the outline and shape of her vagina, particularly the dimensions of her bacon drapes! I think for the purpose of this blog we'll call this lady Kitty.
I know the connotations that come with the words 'camel toe'. Its generally frowned upon as a fashion faux pas and can be both amusing and embarassing for the spectator of such a debacle but I've come to the conclusion that Kitty has thrown social conditioning to the wind and wears her camel toe with pride.
I know it may seem a little odd that I'm talking about a strangers vagina, but I don't think this is a mistake, its a form of communication. She's presenting her hoo hoo for you and I to see. Free from inhibitions and embarasment, she is showing off her vagina's cleavage, or cleavag as I've so fondly named it!
Kitty's cleavag!
But, is Kitty's cleavag happy? I cant imagine that wearing an item of clothing so tight that it visibly tries to split you in two is very comfortable? Does it chafe? Does it bleed? Does it even exist, what if its been rubbed away? What if its a fake! Kitty's cleavag is a fraud!
Ok, sorry about that, but anyway my point is...why? The sick part of me thinks she gets kicks from the gusset of her tight jeans rubbing against her with each step she takes. Then the samaritan in me thinks maybe she has no money and can't afford new clothes that fit. The psychologist in me thinks she might be mentally ill? Maybe she's an exhibitionist and likes to go for a walk and count how many people look at her vagina lips through the fabric of her jeans? Maybe its her hobby?
Either way, I've decided I wont ever stop and ask her, nor will I be promoting camel toe as a fashion trend. I'll stick with my VPL but I do salute you, whoever you are, Kitty, camel toe-cleavag woman for making me question the stigma that is camel toe and the person behind it!
Yours Inquisitively
Crazy Fairy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)